Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10871 - 10880 of 28865 for f.
Search results 10871 - 10880 of 28865 for f.
State v. Ricky A. Myhre
evidence of actual vindictiveness. See United States v. Jackson, 181 F.3d 740, 745 n.4 (6th Cir. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25935 - 2006-07-18
evidence of actual vindictiveness. See United States v. Jackson, 181 F.3d 740, 745 n.4 (6th Cir. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25935 - 2006-07-18
State v. Richard D. Martin
the police and citizens rises to the level of a stop or seizure." United States v. Young, 105 F.3d 1, 5 (1st
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3231 - 2005-03-31
the police and citizens rises to the level of a stop or seizure." United States v. Young, 105 F.3d 1, 5 (1st
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3231 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
by the jury; (f) When the jury returns its verdict; (g) At the pronouncement of judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17017 - 2017-09-21
by the jury; (f) When the jury returns its verdict; (g) At the pronouncement of judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17017 - 2017-09-21
City of Oshkosh v. Steven J. Winkler
action by a state university. See, e.g., Paine v. Board of Regents, 355 F. Supp. 199, 203 (W.D. Tex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10639 - 2005-03-31
action by a state university. See, e.g., Paine v. Board of Regents, 355 F. Supp. 199, 203 (W.D. Tex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10639 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Sara L. Johann
rule, SCR 22.28(4)(f).[10] ¶19 We adopt the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17181 - 2005-03-31
rule, SCR 22.28(4)(f).[10] ¶19 We adopt the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17181 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 142
F.3d 1422, 1432 (7th Cir. 1996); Lunsford v. Bennett, 17 F.3d 1574, 1580 (7th Cir. 1994). Naseer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54228 - 2010-10-26
F.3d 1422, 1432 (7th Cir. 1996); Lunsford v. Bennett, 17 F.3d 1574, 1580 (7th Cir. 1994). Naseer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54228 - 2010-10-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: PAUL F. REILLY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746610 - 2024-01-03
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: PAUL F. REILLY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746610 - 2024-01-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
To: Hon. Charles F. Kahn, Jr. Circuit Court Judge Milwaukee County Courthouse 901 N. 9th Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181226 - 2017-09-21
To: Hon. Charles F. Kahn, Jr. Circuit Court Judge Milwaukee County Courthouse 901 N. 9th Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181226 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge.[1] Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116172 - 2014-07-02
for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge.[1] Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116172 - 2014-07-02
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Moran
doing, we bear in mind that “[f]indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12619 - 2017-09-21
doing, we bear in mind that “[f]indings of fact shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12619 - 2017-09-21