Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10871 - 10880 of 50100 for our.
Search results 10871 - 10880 of 50100 for our.
State v. Kenneth D. Paulson
of the Strickland test. Our focus, however, is whether counsel's performance was deficient. Schembera attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12178 - 2005-03-31
of the Strickland test. Our focus, however, is whether counsel's performance was deficient. Schembera attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12178 - 2005-03-31
State v. George A. Faucher
, the nature of that acquaintanceship. JUROR: [Hayes] was our next-door neighbor, and I knew the family very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13028 - 2005-03-31
, the nature of that acquaintanceship. JUROR: [Hayes] was our next-door neighbor, and I knew the family very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13028 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Hawazen Establishment v. Town of Linn
confusion, our decision speaks as if we are reviewing a determination of a single board. In fact, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8352 - 2017-09-19
confusion, our decision speaks as if we are reviewing a determination of a single board. In fact, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8352 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Roger P. Barber
into the remaining factors of Barker. We accept the State’s concession and proceed with our inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11894 - 2017-09-21
into the remaining factors of Barker. We accept the State’s concession and proceed with our inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11894 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas P. Sterzinger
and unreasonable” interpretations). ¶11 Our conclusion that “knowingly” in WIS. STAT. § 346.04(3) applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4018 - 2017-09-20
and unreasonable” interpretations). ¶11 Our conclusion that “knowingly” in WIS. STAT. § 346.04(3) applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4018 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Calvin Pluim
of the affidavit fails to establish probable cause. See id. at 156. ¶10 Our review of the magistrate’s probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15225 - 2017-09-21
of the affidavit fails to establish probable cause. See id. at 156. ¶10 Our review of the magistrate’s probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15225 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
involvement does not affect our analysis. ¶3 Although it was not the only matter disputed, central
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181419 - 2017-09-21
involvement does not affect our analysis. ¶3 Although it was not the only matter disputed, central
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181419 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 For ease of reference, and because the distinction does not bear on our analysis, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808056 - 2024-06-05
2 For ease of reference, and because the distinction does not bear on our analysis, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808056 - 2024-06-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the new trial in the interest of justice claim. ¶21 Based on our review of the briefs and the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789210 - 2024-04-16
and the new trial in the interest of justice claim. ¶21 Based on our review of the briefs and the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789210 - 2024-04-16
CA Blank Order
Circuit Court case No. 2009CF2574. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire, waiver
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92604 - 2013-02-04
Circuit Court case No. 2009CF2574. Our review of the record—including the plea questionnaire, waiver
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92604 - 2013-02-04