Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10871 - 10880 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 10871 - 10880 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Karen M. v. Craig P.
makes many vague, nonspecific arguments in favor of reversing the judgment. Because the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3680 - 2005-03-31
makes many vague, nonspecific arguments in favor of reversing the judgment. Because the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3680 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(OWI), fourth offense. Austin argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09
(OWI), fourth offense. Austin argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rather, trial counsel provided a statement of facts. He said that Shaw and the victim had consensual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72887 - 2014-09-15
. Rather, trial counsel provided a statement of facts. He said that Shaw and the victim had consensual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72887 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 4, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Ap...
, a new trial, or sentence modification. We affirm for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27644 - 2007-01-03
, a new trial, or sentence modification. We affirm for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27644 - 2007-01-03
State v. Drazen Markovic
to vacate his no contest pleas to five felonies. Markovic maintains that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31
to vacate his no contest pleas to five felonies. Markovic maintains that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31
[PDF]
State v. Elijah Arrington
of conviction, following a jury trial, for first-degree reckless homicide and physical abuse of a child, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8814 - 2017-09-19
of conviction, following a jury trial, for first-degree reckless homicide and physical abuse of a child, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8814 - 2017-09-19
State v. Elijah Arrington
appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for first-degree reckless homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8814 - 2005-03-31
appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for first-degree reckless homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8814 - 2005-03-31
State v. Willy J. Love
a judgment, entered after a jury trial, convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-08-09
a judgment, entered after a jury trial, convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-08-09
[PDF]
Ronald A. Schaefer v. Mark T. Ulinski
argues that the trial court failed to apply the proper standard with respect to corporate fiduciary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3639 - 2017-09-19
argues that the trial court failed to apply the proper standard with respect to corporate fiduciary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3639 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for plea withdrawal, a new trial, or sentence modification. We affirm for the reasons discussed below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27644 - 2014-09-15
for plea withdrawal, a new trial, or sentence modification. We affirm for the reasons discussed below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27644 - 2014-09-15