Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10871 - 10880 of 72821 for we.
Search results 10871 - 10880 of 72821 for we.
State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson
prosecution agreement and is therefore entitled to the dismissal of these convictions. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4687 - 2005-03-31
prosecution agreement and is therefore entitled to the dismissal of these convictions. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4687 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the victim. We conclude Bacon’s trial attorney did not perform deficiently because no speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399050 - 2021-07-28
with the victim. We conclude Bacon’s trial attorney did not perform deficiently because no speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399050 - 2021-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
, and we agree. We consequently reverse the trial court’s order. Background ¶2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117587 - 2014-07-21
, and we agree. We consequently reverse the trial court’s order. Background ¶2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117587 - 2014-07-21
Dean Medical Center v. April Conners
provided precludes Dean from recovering from him for the costs of medical care provided to his child. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15854 - 2005-03-31
provided precludes Dean from recovering from him for the costs of medical care provided to his child. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15854 - 2005-03-31
Shelby L.K. v. Steven O.
claims, however, that we should affirm the trial court’s order establishing the amount due for past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12194 - 2005-03-31
claims, however, that we should affirm the trial court’s order establishing the amount due for past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12194 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregg A. Pfaff
the State’s direct evidence. We agree with the premise. Moreover, the court’s decision relieved the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5407 - 2005-03-31
the State’s direct evidence. We agree with the premise. Moreover, the court’s decision relieved the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5407 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 2 (Wis. Ct. App. November 26, 2008). We summarily affirmed the circuit court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51983 - 2010-07-13
. at 2 (Wis. Ct. App. November 26, 2008). We summarily affirmed the circuit court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51983 - 2010-07-13
[PDF]
WI APP 120
under WIS. STAT. ch. 48.2 ¶2 We conclude WIS. STAT. § 805.04(1) does not apply in a CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33187 - 2014-09-15
under WIS. STAT. ch. 48.2 ¶2 We conclude WIS. STAT. § 805.04(1) does not apply in a CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33187 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Giles L. Smith
competent can be tried under ch. 980. We hold that the legislature, by according to persons tried under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15160 - 2017-09-21
competent can be tried under ch. 980. We hold that the legislature, by according to persons tried under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15160 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
). Accordingly, we summarily reverse the decision of the court of appeals, and No. 2020AP819-CR 2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664284 - 2023-06-02
). Accordingly, we summarily reverse the decision of the court of appeals, and No. 2020AP819-CR 2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664284 - 2023-06-02