Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10881 - 10890 of 16947 for 普通话水平测试朗读作品50篇(KTV跟读版).

[PDF] State v. Anthansiou C. Kourtidias
, it is not an abuse of discretion to impose a sentence without a presentence investigation. See State v. Schilz, 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8934 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and engaged in a rational decision-making process.” State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 318, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098775 - 2026-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
situation.” Id., ¶¶49-50. ¶30 Finally, Staszak points out that Johnson had time to read Staszak his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1148518 - 2026-07-23

Precision Cable Assemblies LLC v. Central Resistor Corporation
. at ¶50. In addition, it specifically alleged that the wire harnesses were damaged both because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3136 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donavan D. Theno
at 49-50. The relevancy determination requires an assessment of probative value. See State v. Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16026 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Alonzo R. Gimenez, M.D. v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
stress. See id. at 649-50, 275 N.W.2d at 670. More specifically, the Board cites the finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9720 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 49
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Darby, 2009 WI App 50, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d 478, 766 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215703 - 2018-09-07

[PDF] Michael S.E. v. Shawn B.S.
a sideline coach in Michael’s harassment game against Shawn.9 See Weichman v. Weichman, 50 Wis. 2d 731
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5041 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Charles Wilson
, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). ¶16 Wilson argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3848 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
hold an evidentiary hearing. Id., ¶¶9, 12; State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34028 - 2014-09-15