Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10881 - 10890 of 64077 for records/1000.
Search results 10881 - 10890 of 64077 for records/1000.
Health Enterprises of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
discharge. We reverse, concluding that there was substantial evidence in the record to support LIRC's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9688 - 2005-03-31
discharge. We reverse, concluding that there was substantial evidence in the record to support LIRC's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9688 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the record, which include, but are not limited to, protection of the community, punishment of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33100 - 2014-09-15
on the record, which include, but are not limited to, protection of the community, punishment of the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33100 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163377 - 2017-09-21
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163377 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
record to this petition. The Department filed a dispositional report with the court on April 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27460 - 2006-12-18
record to this petition. The Department filed a dispositional report with the court on April 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27460 - 2006-12-18
Dorothy Drake v. Burnett County Board of Adjustment
supported by the record and the Board applied the correct legal standards, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25313 - 2006-05-30
supported by the record and the Board applied the correct legal standards, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25313 - 2006-05-30
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Witz could raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105735 - 2013-12-12
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Witz could raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105735 - 2013-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
insists, “It is undisputed from this record that Tautges’s reductions in income were not voluntary because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88769 - 2012-10-29
insists, “It is undisputed from this record that Tautges’s reductions in income were not voluntary because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88769 - 2012-10-29
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as counsel’s no-merit report, Pineda-Gaeta’s response and a supplemental no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101935 - 2013-09-10
the entire record, as well as counsel’s no-merit report, Pineda-Gaeta’s response and a supplemental no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101935 - 2013-09-10
State v. Donald L. Tappa
prior record to the exclusion of other factors; and (2) the sentence was excessive. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4883 - 2005-03-31
prior record to the exclusion of other factors; and (2) the sentence was excessive. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4883 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The court found that the record was devoid of information about Gerald’s efforts, if any, to locate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81500 - 2012-04-24
The court found that the record was devoid of information about Gerald’s efforts, if any, to locate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81500 - 2012-04-24