Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10881 - 10890 of 64077 for records/1000.
Search results 10881 - 10890 of 64077 for records/1000.
Dorothy Drake v. Burnett County Board of Adjustment
supported by the record and the Board applied the correct legal standards, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25313 - 2006-05-30
supported by the record and the Board applied the correct legal standards, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25313 - 2006-05-30
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Witz could raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105735 - 2013-12-12
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Witz could raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105735 - 2013-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
insists, “It is undisputed from this record that Tautges’s reductions in income were not voluntary because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88769 - 2012-10-29
insists, “It is undisputed from this record that Tautges’s reductions in income were not voluntary because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88769 - 2012-10-29
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as counsel’s no-merit report, Pineda-Gaeta’s response and a supplemental no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101935 - 2013-09-10
the entire record, as well as counsel’s no-merit report, Pineda-Gaeta’s response and a supplemental no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101935 - 2013-09-10
State v. Donald L. Tappa
prior record to the exclusion of other factors; and (2) the sentence was excessive. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4883 - 2005-03-31
prior record to the exclusion of other factors; and (2) the sentence was excessive. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4883 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The court found that the record was devoid of information about Gerald’s efforts, if any, to locate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81500 - 2012-04-24
The court found that the record was devoid of information about Gerald’s efforts, if any, to locate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81500 - 2012-04-24
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
of the entire record does not otherwise demonstrate that O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
of the entire record does not otherwise demonstrate that O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Attorney Earle failed to show him cell phone records that the State provided the defense that suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174809 - 2017-09-21
that Attorney Earle failed to show him cell phone records that the State provided the defense that suggest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174809 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
permanent.3 ¶11 The court found that the record was devoid of information about Gerald’s efforts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81500 - 2014-09-15
permanent.3 ¶11 The court found that the record was devoid of information about Gerald’s efforts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81500 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James Merkel v. Village of Germantown
a certification of the record of the proceedings sought to be reviewed by the petition [and] [u]nlike an answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13273 - 2017-09-21
a certification of the record of the proceedings sought to be reviewed by the petition [and] [u]nlike an answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13273 - 2017-09-21