Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10891 - 10900 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 10891 - 10900 of 24568 for extending.
SCR CHAPTER 32
will be of such duration to reasonably allow compliance. For good cause, the judicial education committee may extend
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31226 - 2007-12-13
will be of such duration to reasonably allow compliance. For good cause, the judicial education committee may extend
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31226 - 2007-12-13
CA Blank Order
to twenty years: twelve years’ initial confinement and eight years’ extended supervision, consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146197 - 2015-08-18
to twenty years: twelve years’ initial confinement and eight years’ extended supervision, consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146197 - 2015-08-18
COURT OF APPEALS
to thirty-five years of initial confinement, eight years of extended supervision, and ordered to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85649 - 2012-07-31
to thirty-five years of initial confinement, eight years of extended supervision, and ordered to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85649 - 2012-07-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ extended supervision. The circuit court denied Oligney’s postconviction motion for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104267 - 2017-09-21
’ extended supervision. The circuit court denied Oligney’s postconviction motion for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104267 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and eight years of extended supervision, concurrent with Davis’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263159 - 2020-06-04
years of initial confinement and eight years of extended supervision, concurrent with Davis’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263159 - 2020-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of one and one-half years of initial confinement to be followed by two and one-half years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=648358 - 2023-04-25
of one and one-half years of initial confinement to be followed by two and one-half years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=648358 - 2023-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the policy.[1] The issue here is whether the endorsement extended UIM coverage to injuries from the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31687 - 2008-01-30
the policy.[1] The issue here is whether the endorsement extended UIM coverage to injuries from the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31687 - 2008-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and seven years of extended supervision. The no-merit report first addresses whether Zavala-Quintero’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420754 - 2021-09-08
and seven years of extended supervision. The no-merit report first addresses whether Zavala-Quintero’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420754 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-half years of initial confinement and nineteen and one-half years of extended supervision. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677332 - 2023-07-11
-half years of initial confinement and nineteen and one-half years of extended supervision. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677332 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by 36 months of extended supervision. The term of initial confinement imposed was between
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23
by 36 months of extended supervision. The term of initial confinement imposed was between
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23