Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1091 - 1100 of 45230 for Cost-effective.
Search results 1091 - 1100 of 45230 for Cost-effective.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and possession of a firearm by a felon. 1 He was ordered to “pay the costs, fees, and assessments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213098 - 2018-05-17
and possession of a firearm by a felon. 1 He was ordered to “pay the costs, fees, and assessments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213098 - 2018-05-17
Frontsheet
of costs showing costs in the amount of $231 as of July 26, 2011. The OLR director recommends
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71184 - 2011-09-19
of costs showing costs in the amount of $231 as of July 26, 2011. The OLR director recommends
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71184 - 2011-09-19
Rule Order
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the following amendments to the Supreme Court Rules shall be effective January
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50522 - 2010-07-05
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the following amendments to the Supreme Court Rules shall be effective January
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50522 - 2010-07-05
[PDF]
Durand Cooperatives v. Dennis Emmert
in the amount of $1,232.12. They claim that the judgment, based on the cost of seed received by them from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12417 - 2017-09-21
in the amount of $1,232.12. They claim that the judgment, based on the cost of seed received by them from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12417 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 134
be eligible for reimbursement of the cost of their Medicare Part B premiums, as well as the Medicare Part B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102477 - 2017-09-21
be eligible for reimbursement of the cost of their Medicare Part B premiums, as well as the Medicare Part B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102477 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 83
) challenges a judgment ordering the County to pay the Town of Madison (Town) $75,000 toward the cost
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33333 - 2014-09-15
) challenges a judgment ordering the County to pay the Town of Madison (Town) $75,000 toward the cost
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33333 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
a judgment ordering the County to pay the Town of Madison (Town) $75,000 toward the cost of constructing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33333 - 2008-07-08
a judgment ordering the County to pay the Town of Madison (Town) $75,000 toward the cost of constructing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33333 - 2008-07-08
Frontsheet
to the probate court had violated former SCR 20:3.3(a)(1)[2] (effective through June 30, 2007). The referee also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30289 - 2007-09-13
to the probate court had violated former SCR 20:3.3(a)(1)[2] (effective through June 30, 2007). The referee also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30289 - 2007-09-13
[PDF]
Frontsheet
effective date of the order or judgment of the other jurisdiction constitutes misconduct. (2) Upon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239020 - 2019-04-16
effective date of the order or judgment of the other jurisdiction constitutes misconduct. (2) Upon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239020 - 2019-04-16
[PDF]
WI 117
4 20:3.3(a)(1)2 (effective through June 30, 2007). The referee also concluded that Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30289 - 2014-09-15
4 20:3.3(a)(1)2 (effective through June 30, 2007). The referee also concluded that Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30289 - 2014-09-15