Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1091 - 1100 of 29823 for des.
Search results 1091 - 1100 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138244 - 2015-03-23
judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138244 - 2015-03-23
State v. Bruce Knutson
disagree on the standard of review. The State proposes that this court should review de novo the adequacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3163 - 2005-03-31
disagree on the standard of review. The State proposes that this court should review de novo the adequacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3163 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bank One v. Christian C. Ofojebe
is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as did the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18332 - 2017-09-21
is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as did the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18332 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶10 An individual may be held in contempt for refusing to comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59467 - 2014-09-15
review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶10 An individual may be held in contempt for refusing to comply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59467 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93086 - 2013-02-19
). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93086 - 2013-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient reason is stated is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288212 - 2020-09-16
a sufficient reason is stated is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288212 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which are questions of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
, which are questions of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
precedence over other cases in the circuit court. Following a de novo trial, the circuit court makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164139 - 2017-09-21
precedence over other cases in the circuit court. Following a de novo trial, the circuit court makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164139 - 2017-09-21