Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1091 - 1100 of 3429 for y's.
Search results 1091 - 1100 of 3429 for y's.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 11, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
“to become self-supporting at a standard of living reasonabl[y] comparable to that [he enjoyed] during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49923 - 2010-05-10
“to become self-supporting at a standard of living reasonabl[y] comparable to that [he enjoyed] during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49923 - 2010-05-10
State v. Bee Bus Line
bargaining agreement. Third, [the] contract must “specif[y] a regular rate of pay” for hours up to forty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11078 - 2005-03-31
bargaining agreement. Third, [the] contract must “specif[y] a regular rate of pay” for hours up to forty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11078 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mary K.
parented, has taken on that responsibility, and how the parent has done with that responsibilit[y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18074 - 2017-09-21
parented, has taken on that responsibility, and how the parent has done with that responsibilit[y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18074 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Neal D. Loehrke v. Matt Praxmarer
that Praxmarer told him “[y]ou need to do what we have to do.” Praxmarer, conversely, testified that Loehrke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25624 - 2017-09-21
that Praxmarer told him “[y]ou need to do what we have to do.” Praxmarer, conversely, testified that Loehrke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25624 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. JEREMY Y. ABEYTA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=686135 - 2023-08-03
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. JEREMY Y. ABEYTA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=686135 - 2023-08-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by the government attorney as “voluntar[y],” “timely,” and “significant and useful”). No. 2015AP717-CR 7
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158625 - 2017-09-21
by the government attorney as “voluntar[y],” “timely,” and “significant and useful”). No. 2015AP717-CR 7
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158625 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[of] the alleged offense, you were subject to that injunction. That you intentionally caused bod[il]y harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195964 - 2017-09-21
[of] the alleged offense, you were subject to that injunction. That you intentionally caused bod[il]y harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195964 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
as that control is exercised “reasonabl[y,]” the truth is sought to be ascertained, time is not wasted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31590 - 2014-09-15
as that control is exercised “reasonabl[y,]” the truth is sought to be ascertained, time is not wasted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31590 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to evaluate information and make decisions.” Dr. Hurlbut further testified, “[M]y memory is that she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149745 - 2017-09-21
to evaluate information and make decisions.” Dr. Hurlbut further testified, “[M]y memory is that she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149745 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
.” Valovik testified that he was concerned for his safety, and the trial court reasoned that: [Y]ou don’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27127 - 2006-11-13
.” Valovik testified that he was concerned for his safety, and the trial court reasoned that: [Y]ou don’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27127 - 2006-11-13