Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10901 - 10910 of 30169 for consulta de causas.
Search results 10901 - 10910 of 30169 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. John H. Maclin
of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. See Ziegler, 695 N.W.2d 895, ¶10. The amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19379 - 2017-09-21
of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. See Ziegler, 695 N.W.2d 895, ¶10. The amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant has been denied this right is an issue we review de novo. Id. In reviewing a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110587 - 2017-09-21
a defendant has been denied this right is an issue we review de novo. Id. In reviewing a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110587 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joshua A. Propst
requires us to construe § 973.015, STATS. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14188 - 2014-09-15
requires us to construe § 973.015, STATS. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14188 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth Haug
under § 752.35, Stats. Consistent with Haug's request, we address de novo the question whether the post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10018 - 2005-03-31
under § 752.35, Stats. Consistent with Haug's request, we address de novo the question whether the post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10018 - 2005-03-31
Alexander L. Jacobus v. State
interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8266 - 2005-03-31
interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8266 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cleatus L. Marney, Jr.
. Statutory construction presents a question of law that this court decides de novo. See State v. Martinez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16022 - 2017-09-21
. Statutory construction presents a question of law that this court decides de novo. See State v. Martinez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16022 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209127 - 2018-03-06
was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209127 - 2018-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS
standard, but review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47834 - 2010-03-10
standard, but review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. Id. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47834 - 2010-03-10
Village of Menomonee Falls v. Bryan Preuss
an illegal change in use had been shown is a purely legal issue we review de novo. See Ball v. District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13615 - 2005-03-31
an illegal change in use had been shown is a purely legal issue we review de novo. See Ball v. District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13615 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
this court decides de novo. Id. ¶7 This court also has the power to independently consider the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93425 - 2013-02-27
this court decides de novo. Id. ¶7 This court also has the power to independently consider the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93425 - 2013-02-27