Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10911 - 10920 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] Wisconsin Circuit Court Access Oversight Committee Content and Access Subcommittee January 2006 minutes
Carlson said that any motion brought before the court can be appealed. Atty. Burke said she likes
/courts/committees/docs/contentminutes0106.pdf - 2009-11-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of numerous crimes. He contends that the circuit court erred in (1) denying his motion to suppress his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301006 - 2020-11-04

COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction and from orders denying his postconviction motion and motion to reconsider. Mitchell contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33035 - 2008-06-16

Tris S. Treviranus v. Jay Treviranus
a divorce based on their stipulation resolving all issues, including child custody and placement, support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12398 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John A. Lettice
motion for a new trial. The State argues that there was insufficient evidence of prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10249 - 2017-09-20

State v. John A. Lettice
granting John Lettice's motion for a new trial. The State argues that there was insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10249 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, JJ. Terrence L. Johnson, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175325 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
denying his postconviction motion and motion to reconsider. Mitchell contends that his trial attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33035 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jason J. Cramer v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals
the required documentation later, as they "saw fit." ΒΆ11 On February 18, 1999, Cramer filed a motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17509 - 2017-09-21

Jason J. Cramer v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals
a motion for reconsideration, arguing in part that a litigant seeking review of probation revocation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17509 - 2005-03-31