Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10911 - 10920 of 30165 for de.
Search results 10911 - 10920 of 30165 for de.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. See State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d 208 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074454 - 2026-02-10
that we review de novo. See State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d 325, 329, 466 N.W.2d 208 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074454 - 2026-02-10
State v. Robert K.
subject to our de novo review. Id., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d at 669, 607 N.W.2d at 929. Time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7641 - 2005-03-31
subject to our de novo review. Id., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d at 669, 607 N.W.2d at 929. Time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7641 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jenelle Glasbrenner
, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17883 - 2005-05-02
, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review conclusions of law de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17883 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶30. ¶9 Thao’s current claim in his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901281 - 2025-01-22
of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶30. ¶9 Thao’s current claim in his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901281 - 2025-01-22
CA Blank Order
actions unless those findings are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those actions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123862 - 2014-10-09
actions unless those findings are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those actions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123862 - 2014-10-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). “The application of the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule is an issue of law,” subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250474 - 2019-11-21
). “The application of the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule is an issue of law,” subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250474 - 2019-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. Village of Trempealeau v. Mikrut, 2004 WI 79, ¶7, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11
review de novo. Village of Trempealeau v. Mikrut, 2004 WI 79, ¶7, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
is frivolous is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brunson v. Ward, 2001 WI 89, ¶27, 245 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101402 - 2013-08-28
is frivolous is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brunson v. Ward, 2001 WI 89, ¶27, 245 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101402 - 2013-08-28
Thomas Norman v. Ruby Faulkner
a question of law, and as such is reviewed de novo. See Graziano v. Town of Long Lake, 191 Wis.2d 812, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11400 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, and as such is reviewed de novo. See Graziano v. Town of Long Lake, 191 Wis.2d 812, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11400 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 113
requires that we interpret Wis. Stat. § 973.155(1)(b), a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28262 - 2007-04-26
requires that we interpret Wis. Stat. § 973.155(1)(b), a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28262 - 2007-04-26