Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10911 - 10920 of 24459 for extending.
Search results 10911 - 10920 of 24459 for extending.
[PDF]
State v. Melvin D. Parker, Jr.
trial right. His pretrial incarceration was not extended and his defense was not impaired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4522 - 2017-09-19
trial right. His pretrial incarceration was not extended and his defense was not impaired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4522 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion when it sentenced Shaw to nine years of initial confinement and five years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271656 - 2020-07-28
discretion when it sentenced Shaw to nine years of initial confinement and five years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271656 - 2020-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court imposed four years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. Additionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484167 - 2022-02-16
court imposed four years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision. Additionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484167 - 2022-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial incarceration and nineteen years of extended supervision. The record establishes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218980 - 2018-09-10
years of initial incarceration and nineteen years of extended supervision. The record establishes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218980 - 2018-09-10
State v. Scott J. Bogdala
confinement and ten years of extended supervision. At the time first set for sentencing, Bogdala’s counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6333 - 2005-03-31
confinement and ten years of extended supervision. At the time first set for sentencing, Bogdala’s counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6333 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. See § 801.15(2)(a) (after time for performing act has expired, court may extend the deadline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47049 - 2014-09-15
. See § 801.15(2)(a) (after time for performing act has expired, court may extend the deadline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47049 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and twelve years of extended supervision. On direct appeal, Duke’s appointed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261017 - 2020-05-19
of initial confinement and twelve years of extended supervision. On direct appeal, Duke’s appointed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261017 - 2020-05-19
District II/IV March 1, 2013 To: Hon. Anthony G. Milisauskas Circuit Court Judge Kenosha County C...
by two years of extended supervision, consecutive to the 2003 case. The court denied Tucker sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93596 - 2013-02-28
by two years of extended supervision, consecutive to the 2003 case. The court denied Tucker sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93596 - 2013-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision, to be served consecutively. The record establishes that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214489 - 2018-06-15
years of extended supervision, to be served consecutively. The record establishes that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214489 - 2018-06-15
CA Blank Order
’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision. The no-merit appeal first addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93564 - 2013-03-05
’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision. The no-merit appeal first addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93564 - 2013-03-05