Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10921 - 10930 of 30175 for de.
Search results 10921 - 10930 of 30175 for de.
State v. Donald A. Bratrud
this court decides de novo on appeal. State v. Webster, 196 Wis.2d 308, 316, 538 N.W.2d 810, 813 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10082 - 2005-03-31
this court decides de novo on appeal. State v. Webster, 196 Wis.2d 308, 316, 538 N.W.2d 810, 813 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10082 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an appellate court reviews de novo.” Richards v. First Union Sec., Inc., 2006 WI 55, ¶12, 290 Wis. 2d 620
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170444 - 2017-09-21
an appellate court reviews de novo.” Richards v. First Union Sec., Inc., 2006 WI 55, ¶12, 290 Wis. 2d 620
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170444 - 2017-09-21
Jerry Lu Epstein v. John T. Benson
analysis presents a legal issue that we review de novo. L & W Constr. Co., Inc. v. DOR, 149 Wis.2d 684
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8681 - 2005-03-31
analysis presents a legal issue that we review de novo. L & W Constr. Co., Inc. v. DOR, 149 Wis.2d 684
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8681 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy J. Seaman
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4630 - 2005-03-31
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4630 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
follows. ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96022 - 2013-04-30
follows. ¶7 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96022 - 2013-04-30
Robert H. Diamond, Sr. v. Barbara Ruszkiewicz
court erred in denying summary judgment, that denial is also subject to de novo review. See Weina v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11011 - 2005-03-31
court erred in denying summary judgment, that denial is also subject to de novo review. See Weina v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11011 - 2005-03-31
William J. Evers v. Robert J. Lerner
. The trial court controls its own calendar. Our de novo review of its decision on summary judgment discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11149 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court controls its own calendar. Our de novo review of its decision on summary judgment discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and therefore are subject to de novo review. See Omernick v. Lepak, 112 Wis. 2d 285, 290, 332 N.W.2d 307
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86044 - 2014-09-15
and therefore are subject to de novo review. See Omernick v. Lepak, 112 Wis. 2d 285, 290, 332 N.W.2d 307
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86044 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
June Table of Unpublished Opinions
05-17-2005 Affirmed/reversed/remanded 2003AP003535 Nora De Salvo v. Steven J. Elegreet 04-28
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18896 - 2017-09-21
05-17-2005 Affirmed/reversed/remanded 2003AP003535 Nora De Salvo v. Steven J. Elegreet 04-28
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18896 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T. Van Ornum
N.W.2d 830 (1990). We review the trial court’s conclusion of constitutional reasonableness de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16090 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 830 (1990). We review the trial court’s conclusion of constitutional reasonableness de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16090 - 2017-09-21