Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10921 - 10930 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 10921 - 10930 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Stanley H. Graewin
in the position of having to testify against him. The trial court corrected the information, and informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15734 - 2017-09-21
in the position of having to testify against him. The trial court corrected the information, and informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15734 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for Bailey’s cooperation, he would be able to return home. We conclude that the trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41824 - 2009-10-05
for Bailey’s cooperation, he would be able to return home. We conclude that the trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41824 - 2009-10-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
to return home. We conclude that the trial court found that no promises were made to Bailey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41824 - 2014-09-15
to return home. We conclude that the trial court found that no promises were made to Bailey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41824 - 2014-09-15
Jill Winnega v. North Central Health Protection Plan
for the cost of a wig, or cranial prosthesis, prescribed by her physician. NCHPP argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13648 - 2005-03-31
for the cost of a wig, or cranial prosthesis, prescribed by her physician. NCHPP argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13648 - 2005-03-31
Shane C. Reinhart v. Peggy S. Reinhart
of their three children. He argues that the trial court erred by refusing to allow the children to testify. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16179 - 2005-03-31
of their three children. He argues that the trial court erred by refusing to allow the children to testify. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16179 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stanley H. Graewin
. The trial court corrected the information, and informed Graewin that the actual maximum penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15499 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court corrected the information, and informed Graewin that the actual maximum penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15499 - 2005-03-31
State v. Phillip T. Litzler
substance tax.[1] He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8165 - 2005-03-31
substance tax.[1] He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8165 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dunn County v. Kelly D.
because the trial court erroneously vacated its own order granting her request for substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3128 - 2017-09-19
because the trial court erroneously vacated its own order granting her request for substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3128 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brenda K. Roberts
to criminal penalties including a mandatory jail sentence), the trial court held that the test result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15121 - 2005-03-31
to criminal penalties including a mandatory jail sentence), the trial court held that the test result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15121 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
conviction, and error in the trial court’s decision to deny postconviction relief without an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27421 - 2006-12-13
conviction, and error in the trial court’s decision to deny postconviction relief without an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27421 - 2006-12-13