Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10941 - 10950 of 12798 for se.
Search results 10941 - 10950 of 12798 for se.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the prospective jurors: [u]se of numbers, this is something that I’m a stickler I guess, and I’m going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90012 - 2014-09-15
the prospective jurors: [u]se of numbers, this is something that I’m a stickler I guess, and I’m going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90012 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James B. Williams
. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. James B. Williams, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5785 - 2017-09-19
. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. James B. Williams, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5785 - 2017-09-19
Lorie Novak v. Reginald Phillips
of technical defects. In Dungan, the plaintiff signed the summons as a pro se party, but designated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2995 - 2005-03-31
of technical defects. In Dungan, the plaintiff signed the summons as a pro se party, but designated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2995 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J. Robert Edwin Burkhardt, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90205 - 2012-12-05
and Blanchard, JJ. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J. Robert Edwin Burkhardt, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90205 - 2012-12-05
[PDF]
State v. Erik Gracia
on the United States Supreme Court’s rejection of a per se rule that would exclude all single-photo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4710 - 2017-09-19
on the United States Supreme Court’s rejection of a per se rule that would exclude all single-photo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4710 - 2017-09-19
State v. Randolph S. Miller
was proceeding pro se on the remainder. On a morning that Miller was to appear for a pretrial conference, Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5557 - 2005-03-31
was proceeding pro se on the remainder. On a morning that Miller was to appear for a pretrial conference, Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5557 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
-delineated exceptions, warrantless searches are deemed per se unreasonable” under the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92734 - 2013-02-11
-delineated exceptions, warrantless searches are deemed per se unreasonable” under the United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92734 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
Leslie L. Kuper v. Craig A. Kuper
(2000), a pro se petitioner succeeded in rebutting the presumption contained in Temp. Treas. Reg. 1.71
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2504 - 2017-09-19
(2000), a pro se petitioner succeeded in rebutting the presumption contained in Temp. Treas. Reg. 1.71
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2504 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Stanley Washington v. David H. Schwarz
that a probationer’s extrajudicial admission is per se an adequate basis for revocation. This is because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2097 - 2017-09-19
that a probationer’s extrajudicial admission is per se an adequate basis for revocation. This is because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2097 - 2017-09-19
State v. Randolph S. Miller
was proceeding pro se on the remainder. On a morning that Miller was to appear for a pretrial conference, Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5555 - 2005-03-31
was proceeding pro se on the remainder. On a morning that Miller was to appear for a pretrial conference, Miller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5555 - 2005-03-31