Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10971 - 10980 of 30176 for consulta de causas.
Search results 10971 - 10980 of 30176 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law subject to de novo review. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145440 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law subject to de novo review. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145440 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether Russell was prejudiced are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53135 - 2010-08-09
was deficient and whether Russell was prejudiced are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53135 - 2010-08-09
Kathryn A. Pinter v. Linda Pinter
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 547, 502 N.W.2d at 873. Words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 547, 502 N.W.2d at 873. Words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
State v. Moses Sean P.
at 684. Whether a petition shows prosecutive merit presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8981 - 2005-03-31
at 684. Whether a petition shows prosecutive merit presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8981 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sebastian Molina
professional judgment. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6143 - 2005-03-31
professional judgment. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6143 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 153
and application of a statute presents a question of law that we review de novo. Frisch v. Henrichs, 2007 WI 102
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40492 - 2009-10-27
and application of a statute presents a question of law that we review de novo. Frisch v. Henrichs, 2007 WI 102
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40492 - 2009-10-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are both questions of law (which we review de novo) based upon factual findings (which we will uphold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193954 - 2017-09-21
are both questions of law (which we review de novo) based upon factual findings (which we will uphold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193954 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87609 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87609 - 2014-09-15
State v. Juan Jesus S.
charges violate constitutional protections presents a question of law to be reviewed de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14480 - 2005-03-31
charges violate constitutional protections presents a question of law to be reviewed de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14480 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gregory A. Zimdars
4 Amendment requirements is a question of law we review de novo. Roberts, 196 Wis. 2d at 452
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6641 - 2017-09-20
4 Amendment requirements is a question of law we review de novo. Roberts, 196 Wis. 2d at 452
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6641 - 2017-09-20