Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10981 - 10990 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 10981 - 10990 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Juan S. Torres
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Torres claims the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10058 - 2017-09-19
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Torres claims the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10058 - 2017-09-19
State v. James W.
claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in permitting the foster mother to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7254 - 2005-03-31
claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in permitting the foster mother to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7254 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerry M. Brandt
of the incidents. Brandt argues that the trial court improperly denied his postconviction motion without a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12853 - 2005-03-31
of the incidents. Brandt argues that the trial court improperly denied his postconviction motion without a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12853 - 2005-03-31
Dane County v. Kenneth R. McGrew
juries in civil forfeiture trials, is unconstitutional in Dane County's prosecution of Kenneth McGrew
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19054 - 2005-07-18
juries in civil forfeiture trials, is unconstitutional in Dane County's prosecution of Kenneth McGrew
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19054 - 2005-07-18
[PDF]
Dane County v. Kenneth R. McGrew
(2001-02),1 which mandates six-person juries in civil forfeiture trials, is unconstitutional in Dane
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19054 - 2017-09-21
(2001-02),1 which mandates six-person juries in civil forfeiture trials, is unconstitutional in Dane
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19054 - 2017-09-21
Bryan R. Thompson v. Cheri Thompson
and directing the payment of support arrearages. He contends the trial court erred by: (1) imputing $1,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7924 - 2005-03-31
and directing the payment of support arrearages. He contends the trial court erred by: (1) imputing $1,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7924 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 75
the postjudgment proceedings. We refer to Judge Rosa as the trial court and Judge Van Grunsven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198167 - 2018-08-23
the postjudgment proceedings. We refer to Judge Rosa as the trial court and Judge Van Grunsven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198167 - 2018-08-23
[PDF]
State v. Leah B. Hensiak
modification. Hensiak claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion No. 02-2816-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5802 - 2017-09-19
modification. Hensiak claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion No. 02-2816-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5802 - 2017-09-19
State v. Leah B. Hensiak
. Hensiak claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it imposed a near-maximum fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5802 - 2005-03-31
. Hensiak claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it imposed a near-maximum fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5802 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bryan R. Thompson v. Cheri Thompson
the payment of support arrearages. He contends the trial court erred by: (1) imputing $1,000 to his 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7924 - 2017-09-19
the payment of support arrearages. He contends the trial court erred by: (1) imputing $1,000 to his 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7924 - 2017-09-19