Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10991 - 11000 of 58702 for dos.
Search results 10991 - 11000 of 58702 for dos.
State v. Kevin W. Mitchell
, the defendant must show a fair and just reason for doing so. State v. Shanks, 152 Wis. 2d 284, 288, 448 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3195 - 2005-03-31
, the defendant must show a fair and just reason for doing so. State v. Shanks, 152 Wis. 2d 284, 288, 448 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3195 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jeffery Sanders v. Michael J. Sullivan
. The argument is not supported by any express statement of the department that this was what it was doing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13842 - 2014-09-15
. The argument is not supported by any express statement of the department that this was what it was doing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13842 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
arguments in the Graewins’ briefs that we do not address are either patently meritless or inadequately
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123663 - 2014-10-08
arguments in the Graewins’ briefs that we do not address are either patently meritless or inadequately
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123663 - 2014-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 1. Therefore, we do not regard this as a sufficient reason for Tiggs not raising the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32530 - 2008-04-23
.2d 1. Therefore, we do not regard this as a sufficient reason for Tiggs not raising the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32530 - 2008-04-23
Jeffery Sanders v. Michael J. Sullivan
by any express statement of the department that this was what it was doing. The earning of extra good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13842 - 2005-03-31
by any express statement of the department that this was what it was doing. The earning of extra good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13842 - 2005-03-31
State v. Raul R. Rodriguez
that it would be improper for the court to use the policy in that manner, and we do not address the point. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26605 - 2006-09-27
that it would be improper for the court to use the policy in that manner, and we do not address the point. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26605 - 2006-09-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response despite our extending the deadline to do so. Having independently reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952244 - 2025-05-06
not filed a response despite our extending the deadline to do so. Having independently reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952244 - 2025-05-06
State v. Lorenzo S. Balli
did not file a postconviction motion because he believed that it would have been futile to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3181 - 2005-03-31
did not file a postconviction motion because he believed that it would have been futile to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3181 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel A. Lacosse
the likely probative value of the test result. ¶3 We do not agree that this provision is material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20447 - 2005-11-30
the likely probative value of the test result. ¶3 We do not agree that this provision is material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20447 - 2005-11-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701313 - 2023-09-12
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701313 - 2023-09-12