Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10991 - 11000 of 29429 for er.
Search results 10991 - 11000 of 29429 for er.
State v. Johnny L. Hampton
appeals from an order denying postconviction motions. Hampton claims the trial court erred: (1) when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12124 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying postconviction motions. Hampton claims the trial court erred: (1) when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12124 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard D. Martin
conviction, contending that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3231 - 2005-03-31
conviction, contending that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3231 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
ruled that the trial court erred in dismissing Shirley’s attorney and in finding Shirley in default when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55594 - 2010-10-18
ruled that the trial court erred in dismissing Shirley’s attorney and in finding Shirley in default when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55594 - 2010-10-18
COURT OF APPEALS
for indefiniteness, the damage award is excessive, and the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143686 - 2015-06-30
for indefiniteness, the damage award is excessive, and the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143686 - 2015-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
), and 939.62(1)(b) (2011-12).[1] Hawthorne argues that the trial court erred when it applied the forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96201 - 2013-05-06
), and 939.62(1)(b) (2011-12).[1] Hawthorne argues that the trial court erred when it applied the forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96201 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and/or dispositional hearing as the court erred when it (1) failed to permit her to withdraw her jury demand, (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131970 - 2017-09-21
and/or dispositional hearing as the court erred when it (1) failed to permit her to withdraw her jury demand, (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Barbara A. DuVal
. The trial court erred, she contends, by: (1) allowing inadmissible evidence into the jury room, (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15260 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court erred, she contends, by: (1) allowing inadmissible evidence into the jury room, (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15260 - 2017-09-21
State v. Willie E. Fleming
. He also argues that the circuit court erred by denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10893 - 2005-03-31
. He also argues that the circuit court erred by denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10893 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court erred: (1) by denying his motion to adjourn the sentencing proceeding; (2) by sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30266 - 2007-09-17
court erred: (1) by denying his motion to adjourn the sentencing proceeding; (2) by sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30266 - 2007-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
endangering safety by use of a firearm. He argues that the trial court erred by: (1) precluding cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85724 - 2012-08-07
endangering safety by use of a firearm. He argues that the trial court erred by: (1) precluding cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85724 - 2012-08-07