Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10991 - 11000 of 63219 for records.
Search results 10991 - 11000 of 63219 for records.
State v. Marvin D. Doyle
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9463 - 2005-03-31
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9463 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Julie D. v. Derek P.
). To demonstrate a proper exercise of discretion, the record need merely reflect a reasoned application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14238 - 2014-09-15
). To demonstrate a proper exercise of discretion, the record need merely reflect a reasoned application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14238 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and looked Sislo up on the police records system. When Sislo’s information came up, there “was a big, red
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171232 - 2017-09-21
and looked Sislo up on the police records system. When Sislo’s information came up, there “was a big, red
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171232 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133307 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133307 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
v. Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co., 38 Wis. 2d 656, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). “[W]e may search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80273 - 2012-04-02
v. Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co., 38 Wis. 2d 656, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). “[W]e may search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80273 - 2012-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
is presumed to have acted reasonably and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30481 - 2007-10-02
is presumed to have acted reasonably and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30481 - 2007-10-02
[PDF]
State v. Benjamin M.B.
in the record to support the circuit court's finding that waiver into adult court was proper. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10559 - 2017-09-20
in the record to support the circuit court's finding that waiver into adult court was proper. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10559 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, “stat[ing] the grounds for objection with particularity on the record.” Wis. Stat. § 805.13(3)[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42964 - 2009-11-02
, “stat[ing] the grounds for objection with particularity on the record.” Wis. Stat. § 805.13(3)[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42964 - 2009-11-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.23(3). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192350 - 2017-09-21
. RULE 809.23(3). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192350 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
exercises its discretion when it states on the record its reasons for selecting the particular sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55260 - 2010-10-12
exercises its discretion when it states on the record its reasons for selecting the particular sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55260 - 2010-10-12