Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10991 - 11000 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 10991 - 11000 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Ollie B. LeFlore
trial. After LeFlore discharged his first trial counsel and filed a complaint with the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14211 - 2014-09-15
trial. After LeFlore discharged his first trial counsel and filed a complaint with the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14211 - 2014-09-15
Rebecca M. Yates v. Lucy Meddaugh
with the contract. The trial court dismissed the latter claim and granted limited relief on the former after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4718 - 2005-03-31
with the contract. The trial court dismissed the latter claim and granted limited relief on the former after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4718 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven J. Zack
issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when sentencing Steven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15872 - 2005-03-31
issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when sentencing Steven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15872 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derrell L. Garner
-29 (1994). The trial court directed the prosecutor to explain his challenges and he explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11385 - 2017-09-19
-29 (1994). The trial court directed the prosecutor to explain his challenges and he explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11385 - 2017-09-19
State v. James W.
claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in permitting the foster mother to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7254 - 2005-03-31
claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in permitting the foster mother to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7254 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals a judgment of conviction, entered following a trial to the court, for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44960 - 2014-09-15
appeals a judgment of conviction, entered following a trial to the court, for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44960 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jerry M. Brandt
of the incidents. Brandt argues that the trial court improperly denied his postconviction motion without a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12853 - 2005-03-31
of the incidents. Brandt argues that the trial court improperly denied his postconviction motion without a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12853 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Leonard L. Davis
. He contends that the trial court erred by refusing an in camera review of the victim’s mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15150 - 2017-09-21
. He contends that the trial court erred by refusing an in camera review of the victim’s mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15150 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark E. Rahoi
was unduly harsh and excessive. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5741 - 2005-03-31
was unduly harsh and excessive. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark E. Rahoi
the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion when it imposed sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5741 - 2017-09-19
the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion when it imposed sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5741 - 2017-09-19