Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 111 - 120 of 278 for oar.
Search results 111 - 120 of 278 for oar.
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Knuth
convicting him of third offense operating after revocation (OAR), and seventh offense operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5804 - 2017-09-19
convicting him of third offense operating after revocation (OAR), and seventh offense operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5804 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Knuth
convicting him of third offense operating after revocation (OAR), and seventh offense operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5805 - 2017-09-19
convicting him of third offense operating after revocation (OAR), and seventh offense operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5805 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ricky Jones
. On August 6, 1996, Jones was charged with resisting an officer and operating after revocation (OAR). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13657 - 2005-03-31
. On August 6, 1996, Jones was charged with resisting an officer and operating after revocation (OAR). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13657 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ricky Jones
was charged with resisting an officer and operating after revocation (OAR). He was originally represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13657 - 2017-09-21
was charged with resisting an officer and operating after revocation (OAR). He was originally represented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13657 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William Brunton
or subsequent [OAR] conviction … within a 5-year period, a person may be fined not more than $2,500 and may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11992 - 2017-09-21
or subsequent [OAR] conviction … within a 5-year period, a person may be fined not more than $2,500 and may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11992 - 2017-09-21
State v. William Brunton
a five-year period. Section 343.44(2)(e)(1) states that “for a 5th or subsequent [OAR] conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11992 - 2005-03-31
a five-year period. Section 343.44(2)(e)(1) states that “for a 5th or subsequent [OAR] conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11992 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lawrence P. Peters, Jr.
after revocation (OAR) or suspension of a license. Peters was convicted of fifth-offense OAR, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15780 - 2005-03-31
after revocation (OAR) or suspension of a license. Peters was convicted of fifth-offense OAR, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15780 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward J. Parker
intoxicated (OMVWI) and a fifth offense of operating after revocation (OAR), the resulting sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11493 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated (OMVWI) and a fifth offense of operating after revocation (OAR), the resulting sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11493 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward Parker
intoxicated (OMVWI) and a fifth offense of operating after revocation (OAR), the resulting sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11074 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated (OMVWI) and a fifth offense of operating after revocation (OAR), the resulting sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11074 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a fourth offense, and operating after revocation (OAR), as a seventh offense. Defense counsel raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883780 - 2024-12-05
as a fourth offense, and operating after revocation (OAR), as a seventh offense. Defense counsel raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883780 - 2024-12-05