Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1101 - 1110 of 29966 for de.
Search results 1101 - 1110 of 29966 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93086 - 2013-02-19
). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93086 - 2013-02-19
Ernest J. Pagels, Jr. v. John Vargas
Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result of excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6435 - 2005-03-31
Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result of excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6435 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce Knutson
disagree on the standard of review. The State proposes that this court should review de novo the adequacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3163 - 2005-03-31
disagree on the standard of review. The State proposes that this court should review de novo the adequacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3163 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59467 - 2011-01-31
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59467 - 2011-01-31
State v. Kenneth C. Luedke
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10706 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10706 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63393 - 2014-09-15
from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63393 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138244 - 2017-09-21
of summary judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138244 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient reason is stated is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288212 - 2020-09-16
a sufficient reason is stated is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288212 - 2020-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS
DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03