Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1101 - 1110 of 29823 for des.
Search results 1101 - 1110 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63393 - 2014-09-15
from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63393 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kenneth C. Luedke
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10706 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10706 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138244 - 2015-03-23
judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138244 - 2015-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59467 - 2011-01-31
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59467 - 2011-01-31
Bank One v. Christian C. Ofojebe
As we have seen, this case was decided on summary judgment. Thus, our review is de novo, and we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18332 - 2005-07-26
As we have seen, this case was decided on summary judgment. Thus, our review is de novo, and we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18332 - 2005-07-26
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Knutson
that this court should review de novo the adequacy of the defendant’s threshold showing of necessity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3163 - 2017-09-19
that this court should review de novo the adequacy of the defendant’s threshold showing of necessity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3163 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138244 - 2017-09-21
of summary judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138244 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
precedence over other cases in the circuit court. Following a de novo trial, the circuit court makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164139 - 2017-09-21
precedence over other cases in the circuit court. Following a de novo trial, the circuit court makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164139 - 2017-09-21
Ernest J. Pagels, Jr. v. John Vargas
Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result of excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6435 - 2005-03-31
Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result of excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6435 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient reason is stated is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288212 - 2020-09-16
a sufficient reason is stated is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288212 - 2020-09-16