Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1101 - 1110 of 29828 for des.
Search results 1101 - 1110 of 29828 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59467 - 2011-01-31
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review questions of law de novo. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59467 - 2011-01-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138244 - 2017-09-21
of summary judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138244 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
precedence over other cases in the circuit court. Following a de novo trial, the circuit court makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164139 - 2017-09-21
precedence over other cases in the circuit court. Following a de novo trial, the circuit court makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164139 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient reason is stated is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288212 - 2020-09-16
a sufficient reason is stated is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288212 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which are questions of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
, which are questions of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93086 - 2013-02-19
). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93086 - 2013-02-19
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth C. Luedke
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10706 - 2017-09-20
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10706 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
[PDF]
Ernest J. Pagels, Jr. v. John Vargas
it found that John Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6435 - 2017-09-19
it found that John Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6435 - 2017-09-19
2007 WI APP 125
the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review”). Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28539 - 2007-04-26
the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review”). Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28539 - 2007-04-26