Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11001 - 11010 of 82941 for simple case search.
Search results 11001 - 11010 of 82941 for simple case search.
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15953 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15953 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15954 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15954 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph D. Haas
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15956 - 2017-09-21
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15956 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the police executed a search warrant at the apartment. The police found Omot, Schroedl, and a woman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58135 - 2014-09-15
, the police executed a search warrant at the apartment. The police found Omot, Schroedl, and a woman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58135 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph D. Haas
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15953 - 2017-09-21
lot was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15953 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph D. Haas
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15956 - 2005-03-31
was not a search or seizure and did not affect a privacy interest. ¶4 On appeal, Haas argues that attaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15956 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
significant dental and health expenses. ¶8 The case was tried to a jury. Dr. Gatzke admitted that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240152 - 2019-05-02
significant dental and health expenses. ¶8 The case was tried to a jury. Dr. Gatzke admitted that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240152 - 2019-05-02
[PDF]
Drug court practitioner fact sheet: Spice, K2 and the problem of synthetic cannabinoids
Centers report- ed 567 cases in 41 states in which people had suffered adverse reactions to Spice dur- ing
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/spicefactsheet.pdf - 2021-09-23
Centers report- ed 567 cases in 41 states in which people had suffered adverse reactions to Spice dur- ing
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/spicefactsheet.pdf - 2021-09-23
[PDF]
State v. David J. Baertschi
the State’s case, rather than trying to exclude it. ¶8 Baertschi also contends that counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15607 - 2017-09-21
the State’s case, rather than trying to exclude it. ¶8 Baertschi also contends that counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15607 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
suspicion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904186 - 2025-01-22
suspicion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904186 - 2025-01-22