Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11011 - 11020 of 59408 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 11011 - 11020 of 59408 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
James O'Connor v. Carma Sue Rainer
2 representative of the Estate of James Zingale, dismissing O’Connor’s claim against the Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15695 - 2017-09-21
2 representative of the Estate of James Zingale, dismissing O’Connor’s claim against the Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15695 - 2017-09-21
Margaret Lamkin v. St. Croix County
a summary judgment dismissing her claims against St. Croix County for social security payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10088 - 2005-03-31
a summary judgment dismissing her claims against St. Croix County for social security payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10088 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Margaret Lamkin v. St. Croix County
dismissing her claims against St. Croix County for social security payments and employment benefits arising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10088 - 2017-09-19
dismissing her claims against St. Croix County for social security payments and employment benefits arising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10088 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the notice of claim statute, WIS. STAT. § 893.80 (2017-18).1 The circuit court granted the Village’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298966 - 2020-10-27
with the notice of claim statute, WIS. STAT. § 893.80 (2017-18).1 The circuit court granted the Village’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298966 - 2020-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss Moser’s action under the doctrine of claim preclusion. In a prior action, following Moser’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98294 - 2014-09-15
to dismiss Moser’s action under the doctrine of claim preclusion. In a prior action, following Moser’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98294 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court granting Anchor Bank’s motion to dismiss Moser’s action under the doctrine of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98294 - 2013-06-19
of the circuit court granting Anchor Bank’s motion to dismiss Moser’s action under the doctrine of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98294 - 2013-06-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of himself personally and his company raising various tort claims he believes are not subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184847 - 2017-09-21
of himself personally and his company raising various tort claims he believes are not subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184847 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gary L. Addison v. Grant County
determined that the plaintiffs had failed to file a notice of claim with Grant County as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11021 - 2017-09-19
determined that the plaintiffs had failed to file a notice of claim with Grant County as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11021 - 2017-09-19
Gary L. Addison v. Grant County
the County. The trial court determined that the plaintiffs had failed to file a notice of claim with Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11021 - 2005-03-31
the County. The trial court determined that the plaintiffs had failed to file a notice of claim with Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11021 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
, Inc. agreed to pay the initial $500,000 on certain claims made against it under the policy. Liberty
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51282 - 2010-06-21
, Inc. agreed to pay the initial $500,000 on certain claims made against it under the policy. Liberty
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51282 - 2010-06-21