Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11011 - 11020 of 30172 for de.
Search results 11011 - 11020 of 30172 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis. 2d 433, 436
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33050 - 2008-06-16
a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis. 2d 433, 436
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33050 - 2008-06-16
State v. Benjamin Mora
. State v. Owen, 202 Wis. 2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d 50 (Ct. App. 1996). Although we review the claim de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2985 - 2005-03-31
. State v. Owen, 202 Wis. 2d 620, 640, 551 N.W.2d 50 (Ct. App. 1996). Although we review the claim de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2985 - 2005-03-31
Ray A. Peterson v. Teresa E. Tucker
the trial court’s conclusion de novo, and we agree with it. Had the trial court found for Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15113 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s conclusion de novo, and we agree with it. Had the trial court found for Peterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15113 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dale W. Repinski
facts, however, are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10180 - 2005-03-31
facts, however, are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10180 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion alleges sufficient material facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061842 - 2026-01-14
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion alleges sufficient material facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061842 - 2026-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶14. ¶9 Rice has not demonstrated that his no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35203 - 2009-01-12
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶14. ¶9 Rice has not demonstrated that his no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35203 - 2009-01-12
CA Blank Order
granted summary judgment is a question of law for our de novo review. Belding II, 2014 WI 8, ¶13, 352 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112092 - 2014-05-06
granted summary judgment is a question of law for our de novo review. Belding II, 2014 WI 8, ¶13, 352 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112092 - 2014-05-06
State v. Irvon L. Crawford
and statutory standards is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. See id. The essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12647 - 2005-03-31
and statutory standards is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. See id. The essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12647 - 2005-03-31
State v. Irving Washington
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12646 - 2005-03-31
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12646 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of historical fact under the deferential clearly erroneous standard, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54519 - 2010-09-15
court’s findings of historical fact under the deferential clearly erroneous standard, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54519 - 2010-09-15