Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11011 - 11020 of 49821 for our.

State v. Jerald J. McDowell
ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Our review of the sentence is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10604 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
not raise any meritorious issues in postconviction proceedings. Our opinion addressed Faber’s claim, in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34511 - 2008-11-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of discretion or otherwise failed to consider the best interests of the children. Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147278 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and our review is limited to determining if the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588406 - 2022-11-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, could not dispute his repeater convictions and the resulting sentences. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175610 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
that the permanent injunction was a proper exercise of the circuit court’s discretion. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95539 - 2013-04-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Kastner. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123442 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that denied his petition for sentence adjustment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185116 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
affirmed the order of the circuit court. On July 2, 2007, the supreme court summarily vacated our opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32492 - 2008-04-21

State v. Wilbert L. Thomas
a word or clause superfluous). Our conclusion that the legislature did not intend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13530 - 2005-03-31