Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11021 - 11030 of 28716 for f.

[PDF] 02-01 Amendment of Wis. Stats. Ch. 809, Rules of Appellate Procedure, and SCR 71.04 governing court reporters (Effective 1-1-03)
(f) "Sentencing" means the imposition of a sentence, a fine, or probation in a criminal case
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1127 - 2017-09-19

State v. Peter Kienitz
with the decision in Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F. Supp. 1078 (E.D. Wis. 1972), which held the then current version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12502 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
also Bodum USA, Inc. v. La Cafetiere, Inc., 621 F.3d 624, 638-39 (7th Cir. 2010) (Wood, J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473528 - 2022-01-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Information accordingly, and he presented evidence that he took paternity leave “[f]or a large chunk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563027 - 2022-09-07

[PDF] WI App 60
, V. DREAMA F. HARVEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Opinion Filed: October 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574838 - 2023-01-12

Daniel J.R. LaCount v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
in its amicus brief that § 632.32(5)(f) applies. Paragraph (f) of § 632.32(5) provides: A policy may
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21308 - 2010-04-25

[PDF] WI 94
a protective search. See United States v. Edmonds, 240 F.3d 55, 61, (D.C. Cir. 2001) (recognizing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33410 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] 02-01 Amendment of Wis. Stats. Ch. 809, Rules of Appellate Procedure, and SCR 71.04 governing court reporters (Effective 1-1-03)
(f) "Sentencing" means the imposition of a sentence, a fine, or probation in a criminal case
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
149 (1977). In other words, “[i]f the [agency] developed a reviewable record and its negative-EIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963440 - 2025-05-30

State v. Wyatt Daniel Henning
(1896). As the Supreme Court explained in a more recent case: [I]f the first trial has ended
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16625 - 2005-03-31