Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11051 - 11060 of 18714 for quote.

[PDF] Jeffrey Knight v. Milwaukee County
not. Id., 21 Wis. 2d at 29–30, 123 N.W.2d at 508. The italicized portion of the quote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2462 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Jorgensen, 2008 WI 60, ¶22, 310 Wis. 2d 138, 754 N.W.2d 77 (quoting Mayo, 301 Wis. 2d 642
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=895390 - 2024-12-27

[PDF] Kara B. v. Dane County
of the official's action. Id. at 326, quoting Anderson, 483 U.S. at 641 (footnote omitted). This court also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16910 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
in the 1973 resolution quoted above. ¶23 One handbook, the City of Milwaukee Management Plan 1983-84
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35056 - 2008-12-29

Kimberly Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
] own body.’” Martin, 192 Wis.2d at 156, 531 N.W.2d at 76 (quoting Schloendorff v. Society of New York
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11886 - 2011-08-08

[PDF] WI APP 54
that this is an administrative review dependent on the meaning of WIS. STAT. § 102.35(3) (2007-08).1 It quotes the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48347 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Juneau County v. Courthouse Employees
interpretations of the statute Juneau County relies on the language of § 111.70(4)(cm)6.a. italicized and quoted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17161 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jay A. Starkweather
that the defendant is not entitled to relief. Id. at 309-10, 548 N.W.2d at 53 (quoting Nelson, 54 Wis.2d at 497-98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13808 - 2005-03-31

State v. Pamela L. Peters
believe, but the quote makes a point: plain meaning is frequently in the eye of the beholder. What
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16573 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bart C. Gruetzmacher
(quoting Green v. United States, 355 U.S. 184, 187-88 (1957)). ¶21 In Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16689 - 2005-03-31