Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11051 - 11060 of 56379 for so.
Search results 11051 - 11060 of 56379 for so.
[PDF]
Michael P. Rogers v. Cathy Rogers
as the primary caretaker and continues to do so. She lives only one block from the Elmwood school, so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3186 - 2017-09-19
as the primary caretaker and continues to do so. She lives only one block from the Elmwood school, so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3186 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
shot Jenkins in the head and that he had fled the area after doing so. However, Baker testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206291 - 2017-12-28
shot Jenkins in the head and that he had fled the area after doing so. However, Baker testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206291 - 2017-12-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“was pretty cold. So it indicated that the vehicle had been running very recently.” ¶6 The deputy rang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968946 - 2025-06-11
“was pretty cold. So it indicated that the vehicle had been running very recently.” ¶6 The deputy rang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968946 - 2025-06-11
State v. Larry Luckett
his Miranda[3] rights. Luckett stated that he needed money to settle a drug debt so he decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12593 - 2005-03-31
his Miranda[3] rights. Luckett stated that he needed money to settle a drug debt so he decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12593 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas L. Stafford
to the State and the conviction, “is so insufficient in probative value and force that it can be said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4995 - 2005-03-31
to the State and the conviction, “is so insufficient in probative value and force that it can be said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the complaint, and so Specialists had not previously addressed it. Nonetheless, Specialists argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142715 - 2017-09-21
in the complaint, and so Specialists had not previously addressed it. Nonetheless, Specialists argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142715 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Barton
to testify because doing so violated his confrontation right.3 Our supreme court directly addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20764 - 2017-09-21
to testify because doing so violated his confrontation right.3 Our supreme court directly addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20764 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not think of a reason for someone to park there, so he pulled into the parking lot because Roettger had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292025 - 2020-10-01
not think of a reason for someone to park there, so he pulled into the parking lot because Roettger had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292025 - 2020-10-01
State v. Keith A. Franszczak
with the assumption that an employee had intentionally left the door open so as not to be locked out. Franszczak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3994 - 2005-03-31
with the assumption that an employee had intentionally left the door open so as not to be locked out. Franszczak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3994 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
it.” They then got into Eaton’s car and drove back to Nellum’s house so he could retrieve an old non-working
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27378 - 2014-09-15
it.” They then got into Eaton’s car and drove back to Nellum’s house so he could retrieve an old non-working
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27378 - 2014-09-15