Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11061 - 11070 of 64233 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".
Search results 11061 - 11070 of 64233 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 the case against Michael T. Paczkowski, who was arrested for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431822 - 2021-09-29
-CR 2 the case against Michael T. Paczkowski, who was arrested for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431822 - 2021-09-29
State v. Eugene E. Volk
arrest does not constitute a detainer within the meaning of the IAD. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31
arrest does not constitute a detainer within the meaning of the IAD. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene E. Volk
arrest does not constitute a detainer within the meaning of the IAD. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2509 - 2005-03-31
arrest does not constitute a detainer within the meaning of the IAD. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2509 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At the motion hearing, Deputy Bradley Stoddard testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28602 - 2007-03-28
. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At the motion hearing, Deputy Bradley Stoddard testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28602 - 2007-03-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the deputy lacked the requisite probable cause to arrest. At the motion hearing, the deputy testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91376 - 2014-09-15
that the deputy lacked the requisite probable cause to arrest. At the motion hearing, the deputy testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91376 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the corrections officer had “full arrest authority.” However, the court found the plea agreement to Gierczak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12
that the corrections officer had “full arrest authority.” However, the court found the plea agreement to Gierczak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not establish that the corrections officer had “full arrest authority.” However, the court found the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90589 - 2014-09-15
not establish that the corrections officer had “full arrest authority.” However, the court found the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90589 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Specifically, Adekale argues that the state trooper unlawfully arrested him when, during the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630911 - 2023-03-09
. Specifically, Adekale argues that the state trooper unlawfully arrested him when, during the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630911 - 2023-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” complaint and warrant for arrest. The complaint identified John Doe by a description of his DNA profile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97846 - 2014-09-15
” complaint and warrant for arrest. The complaint identified John Doe by a description of his DNA profile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97846 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
8, 2004, the State filed a “John Doe” complaint and warrant for arrest. The complaint identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97846 - 2013-06-11
8, 2004, the State filed a “John Doe” complaint and warrant for arrest. The complaint identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97846 - 2013-06-11