Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11061 - 11070 of 70056 for hi.
Search results 11061 - 11070 of 70056 for hi.
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals the order denying his postcommitment motion.1 Stokes contends that: (1) his constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28157 - 2014-09-15
appeals the order denying his postcommitment motion.1 Stokes contends that: (1) his constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28157 - 2014-09-15
State v. Levi Booth
his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that the trial court erred in failing to conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4234 - 2005-03-31
his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that the trial court erred in failing to conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4234 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
argues that his due process rights were violated when a police officer gave him misleading information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914976 - 2025-02-19
argues that his due process rights were violated when a police officer gave him misleading information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914976 - 2025-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
-degree sexual assault with the use of force and from an order denying without a hearing his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36451 - 2009-05-11
-degree sexual assault with the use of force and from an order denying without a hearing his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36451 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
stop, contending that the officer violated his constitutional right to be free from unreasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904186 - 2025-01-22
stop, contending that the officer violated his constitutional right to be free from unreasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904186 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred by denying his suppression motion because the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108799 - 2017-09-21
erred by denying his suppression motion because the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate amended judgments of conviction entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578783 - 2022-10-19
appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate amended judgments of conviction entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=578783 - 2022-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of 2005. After nearly a year on the waiting list, McCullough and his DVR counselor formulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91294 - 2013-01-07
of 2005. After nearly a year on the waiting list, McCullough and his DVR counselor formulated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91294 - 2013-01-07
COURT OF APPEALS
that part of a postconviction order partially denying his sentence modification motion.[1] The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28916 - 2007-06-26
that part of a postconviction order partially denying his sentence modification motion.[1] The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28916 - 2007-06-26
State v. James R. Coleman
fondled a coworker. In support of its claim, the State introduced testimony from three of his other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10258 - 2005-03-31
fondled a coworker. In support of its claim, the State introduced testimony from three of his other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10258 - 2005-03-31