Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11071 - 11080 of 44388 for name change.
Search results 11071 - 11080 of 44388 for name change.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, several times, more than three times. That part has never changed. The State also argued that Alice’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967584 - 2025-06-10
, several times, more than three times. That part has never changed. The State also argued that Alice’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967584 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
Fond du Lac County Department of Social Services v. Samuel S.
did not recite or propose any change in placement. It also explains why Judge Grimm’s extension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11899 - 2017-09-21
did not recite or propose any change in placement. It also explains why Judge Grimm’s extension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11899 - 2017-09-21
Juneau County v. Sauk County
. ROGGENSACK, J. Juneau County appeals an order denying its motion for a change of the county of residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12469 - 2005-03-31
. ROGGENSACK, J. Juneau County appeals an order denying its motion for a change of the county of residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12469 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Juneau County v. Sauk County
, J. Juneau County appeals an order denying its motion for a change of the county of residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12469 - 2017-09-21
, J. Juneau County appeals an order denying its motion for a change of the county of residence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12469 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
briefing.[2] The State asserted that the change in the federal sentencing guidelines was not a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97212 - 2013-05-28
briefing.[2] The State asserted that the change in the federal sentencing guidelines was not a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97212 - 2013-05-28
James Reese v. City of Pewaukee
in a correspondingly higher property tax liability. The mailing address for the parcel in question had changed in 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3780 - 2005-03-31
in a correspondingly higher property tax liability. The mailing address for the parcel in question had changed in 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3780 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was a substantial change of circumstances that warranted an increased maintenance obligation. We reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78373 - 2012-02-21
was a substantial change of circumstances that warranted an increased maintenance obligation. We reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78373 - 2012-02-21
[PDF]
James Reese v. City of Pewaukee
in question had changed in 1997 and, although the City had notice of the change as early as February 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3780 - 2017-09-19
in question had changed in 1997 and, although the City had notice of the change as early as February 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3780 - 2017-09-19
Fond du Lac County Department of Social Services v. Samuel S.
or propose any change in placement. It also explains why Judge Grimm’s extension order did not recite any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11899 - 2005-03-31
or propose any change in placement. It also explains why Judge Grimm’s extension order did not recite any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11899 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the motions insufficient, the trial court later ordered briefing.2 The State asserted that the change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97212 - 2014-09-15
the motions insufficient, the trial court later ordered briefing.2 The State asserted that the change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97212 - 2014-09-15