Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11071 - 11080 of 46921 for show's.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
showed that Kirsten did not accept and exercise significant responsibility for the daily supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117130 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that a sufficient factual basis existed in the criminal complaints to support Wayman’s pleas. The record shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100748 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that none of the three police officers provided testimony showing that the officers had reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561405 - 2022-09-01

[PDF] State v. Dale Gould, Jr.
instances of sexual conduct showing the source or origin of semen, pregnancy or disease, for use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2406 - 2017-09-19

State v. Chandler D. Hall
." When Bauhs asked for identification, Hall responded, "I don't have to show you any ID. I'm a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10841 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Allen Tony Davis
’ to attack Deputy Metz’s credibility in front of the jury, a review of the record shows…that No. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15911 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
by the Sixth Amendment.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. Even if a defendant can show that his or her counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28013 - 2007-02-05

State v. Jonathan R. Torres
. Discussion ¶5 A defendant seeking modification based on a new factor must show that (1) the new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31

State v. Alfonzo T. Young
performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16280 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the court commissioner show Schnell was advised of his right to have the denial reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146650 - 2015-08-19