Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11091 - 11100 of 59392 for quit claim deed.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
that Stapleton’s claim was not cognizable in a motion for sentence modification and so treated the motion as one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27314 - 2006-12-04

COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court concluded that Wheeler’s claims are procedurally barred, and we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not give a sufficient reason why he did not raise his claims in his first § 974.06 motion. See State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185364 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
No. 2004AP3348-CR 2 court reasoned that Stapleton’s claim was not cognizable in a motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27314 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Andrew S. Zieve v. Ness
appeals from an order granting summary judgment and dismissing his claim against a South Carolina law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9361 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d at 181. Claims that could have been raised on direct appeal or by prior motion are barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92348 - 2013-02-04

State v. Randy J. Stahl
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Among other things, he claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26339 - 2006-08-30

[PDF] Ambrose Groshek v. Dale D. Miller
that the trial court erred in concluding that claim preclusion required dismissal of his action. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12839 - 2017-09-21

Andrew S. Zieve v. Ness
Andrew S. Zieve appeals from an order granting summary judgment and dismissing his claim against a South
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9361 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
I, § 11. The circuit court summarily dismissed Kuranda’s state and federal constitutional claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109302 - 2014-03-17