Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11091 - 11100 of 60214 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 11091 - 11100 of 60214 for quit claim deed/1000.
CA Blank Order
Davis (“the Estate”) appeals from a circuit court order dismissing on summary judgment its claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126146 - 2014-11-11
Davis (“the Estate”) appeals from a circuit court order dismissing on summary judgment its claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126146 - 2014-11-11
[PDF]
Mark Kypke v. Atterbury
CURIAM. Mark Kypke appeals a judgment dismissing his legal malpractice claim against the law firm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6270 - 2017-09-19
CURIAM. Mark Kypke appeals a judgment dismissing his legal malpractice claim against the law firm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6270 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the tenant’s small claims action against her 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90207 - 2014-09-15
the tenant’s small claims action against her 1 This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90207 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 40
litigating its claims against Florstar. We agree and reverse the order. We remand for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46723 - 2011-02-07
litigating its claims against Florstar. We agree and reverse the order. We remand for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46723 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
WI APP 40
No. 2009AP540 2 prevented Flooring Brokers from litigating its claims against Florstar. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46723 - 2014-09-15
No. 2009AP540 2 prevented Flooring Brokers from litigating its claims against Florstar. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46723 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
] This appeal by a pro se tenant presents two issues. The circuit court dismissed the tenant’s small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90207 - 2012-12-05
] This appeal by a pro se tenant presents two issues. The circuit court dismissed the tenant’s small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90207 - 2012-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
$10,000 in attorney’s fees as a sanction against Thompson for maintaining frivolous claims. Thompson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81317 - 2012-04-18
$10,000 in attorney’s fees as a sanction against Thompson for maintaining frivolous claims. Thompson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81317 - 2012-04-18
[PDF]
Clinton J. Colby v. Columbia County
had dismissed the action against Columbia County on the ground that Colby's claim had accrued more
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16890 - 2017-09-21
had dismissed the action against Columbia County on the ground that Colby's claim had accrued more
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16890 - 2017-09-21
Clinton J. Colby v. Columbia County
the action against Columbia County on the ground that Colby's claim had accrued more than 3 years before
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16890 - 2005-03-31
the action against Columbia County on the ground that Colby's claim had accrued more than 3 years before
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16890 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
frivolous claims. Thompson’s complaint arose from a road improvement project by the Town that Thompson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81317 - 2014-09-15
frivolous claims. Thompson’s complaint arose from a road improvement project by the Town that Thompson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81317 - 2014-09-15