Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11091 - 11100 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Thomas M. Eugster v. Dawn R. Eugster
Eugster appeals from the trial court’s order allowing Dawn Breedlove, his former wife, to move to Antigo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3316 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
] alleging ineffective assistance of postconviction and trial counsel and denying his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105209 - 2013-12-10

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
and to a jury trial were violated when the trial court considered the evidence from the kidnapping and first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28076 - 2007-02-12

State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
in restitution to his victims. After Duerst’s probation was revoked in 1996, the trial court sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14959 - 2005-03-31

Thomas M. Eugster v. Dawn R. Eugster
the trial court’s order allowing Dawn Breedlove, his former wife, to move to Antigo, Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3316 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Devon L. Telfered
him of felony murder and an order denying him postconviction relief. The trial court entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6798 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Michael W. Hilger v. Wisconsin Central, Ltd.
action against Wisconsin Central, Ltd.1 The trial court dismissed the action based on the jury's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8497 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 940.03 (2007-08).[1] The trial court imposed a twenty-seven-year sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49272 - 2010-04-26

[PDF] State v. Derek W. Pfeil
the information mid-trial; (2) whether Pfeil’s counsel Nos. 02-0455-CR 03-0495-CR 2 ineffectively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4951 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Mary E. Haun v. Thomas V. Rankin, M.D.
argues that the trial court should have changed the jury’s answer to the cause question because Haun’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3327 - 2017-09-19