Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
WI APP 135
-Brooks, Inc. and The Coca-Cola No. 2013AP203 2 Company’s motion for partial summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103542 - 2017-09-21
-Brooks, Inc. and The Coca-Cola No. 2013AP203 2 Company’s motion for partial summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103542 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the divorce. ¶3 The parties stipulated to joint custody and shared placement. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52029 - 2014-09-15
of the divorce. ¶3 The parties stipulated to joint custody and shared placement. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52029 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, age seventeen, at the time of the divorce. ¶3 The parties stipulated to joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52029 - 2010-07-12
, age seventeen, at the time of the divorce. ¶3 The parties stipulated to joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52029 - 2010-07-12
[PDF]
John P. Catlin v. Kirstin A. Catlin
presented by the parties and No. 02-1591 22 reasonably awarded joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5358 - 2017-09-19
presented by the parties and No. 02-1591 22 reasonably awarded joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5358 - 2017-09-19
John P. Catlin v. Kirstin A. Catlin
awarded the parties joint legal custody of all three children. Regarding physical placement, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5358 - 2005-03-31
awarded the parties joint legal custody of all three children. Regarding physical placement, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5358 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
violations. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the orders of the circuit court but deny the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44709 - 2009-12-16
violations. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the orders of the circuit court but deny the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44709 - 2009-12-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, JOINT-PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V. ROBERT E. BURKE, JOINT-PETITIONER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218468 - 2018-08-30
, JOINT-PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V. ROBERT E. BURKE, JOINT-PETITIONER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218468 - 2018-08-30
Appeal No
deposited into a joint account, inasmuch as joint account holders do not owe each other any duty under Wis
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27318 - 2006-12-04
deposited into a joint account, inasmuch as joint account holders do not owe each other any duty under Wis
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27318 - 2006-12-04
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2005AP2492 Cir. Ct. No. 2003CV2344
for the agent’s personal use when such funds have been deposited into a joint account, inasmuch as joint account
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27318 - 2014-09-15
for the agent’s personal use when such funds have been deposited into a joint account, inasmuch as joint account
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27318 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to deliver and an order denying his postconviction motion seeking plea withdrawal. He argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932542 - 2025-03-26
to deliver and an order denying his postconviction motion seeking plea withdrawal. He argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932542 - 2025-03-26