Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 6253 for cf.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 6253 for cf.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that it is expected to consider at the original sentencing hearing. See id.; and cf. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 131
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712544 - 2023-10-11
that it is expected to consider at the original sentencing hearing. See id.; and cf. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 131
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712544 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that it is expected to consider at the original sentencing hearing. See id.; and cf. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 131
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712544 - 2023-10-11
that it is expected to consider at the original sentencing hearing. See id.; and cf. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 131
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712544 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Carlton R. Holland
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-0976-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-576 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3829 - 2017-09-20
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-0976-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-576 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3829 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jerry Lee Cox
of the probation revocation decision. Cf. State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis.2d 376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13800 - 2014-09-15
of the probation revocation decision. Cf. State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis.2d 376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13800 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Brian Maus v. Corwin VanderArk
to the corrections complaint examiner. Cf. WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 310.13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13076 - 2017-09-21
to the corrections complaint examiner. Cf. WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 310.13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13076 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
decision to not pursue the motion. Cf. State v. McDonald, 50 Wis. 2d 534, 537, 184 N.W.2d 886 (1971
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29358 - 2007-06-12
decision to not pursue the motion. Cf. State v. McDonald, 50 Wis. 2d 534, 537, 184 N.W.2d 886 (1971
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29358 - 2007-06-12
[PDF]
State v. Jerry Lee Cox
of the probation revocation decision. Cf. State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis.2d 376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13801 - 2014-09-15
of the probation revocation decision. Cf. State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis.2d 376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13801 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dennis Gutknecht
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-1128-CR Cir. Ct. No. 97-CF-73 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3890 - 2017-09-20
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-1128-CR Cir. Ct. No. 97-CF-73 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3890 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Alger
indication that the records actually contain impeachment material of the kind sought. Cf. United States v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15359 - 2017-09-21
indication that the records actually contain impeachment material of the kind sought. Cf. United States v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15359 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that she made subsequent to the statement.” Cf. State v. Hunt, 2003 WI 81, ¶55, 263 Wis. 2d 1, 666 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52009 - 2014-09-15
that she made subsequent to the statement.” Cf. State v. Hunt, 2003 WI 81, ¶55, 263 Wis. 2d 1, 666 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52009 - 2014-09-15