Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 30059 for de.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138244 - 2017-09-21
of summary judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138244 - 2017-09-21
Bank One v. Christian C. Ofojebe
As we have seen, this case was decided on summary judgment. Thus, our review is de novo, and we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18332 - 2005-07-26
As we have seen, this case was decided on summary judgment. Thus, our review is de novo, and we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18332 - 2005-07-26
Ernest J. Pagels, Jr. v. John Vargas
Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result of excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6435 - 2005-03-31
Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result of excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6435 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93086 - 2013-02-19
). We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93086 - 2013-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient reason is stated is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288212 - 2020-09-16
a sufficient reason is stated is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288212 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which are questions of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
, which are questions of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 125
the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review”). Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28539 - 2007-04-26
the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review”). Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28539 - 2007-04-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to grant a defendant a Machner hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Ruffin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
to grant a defendant a Machner hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Ruffin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14