Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 29713 for des.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 29713 for des.
Bank One v. Christian C. Ofojebe
As we have seen, this case was decided on summary judgment. Thus, our review is de novo, and we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18332 - 2005-07-26
As we have seen, this case was decided on summary judgment. Thus, our review is de novo, and we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18332 - 2005-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138244 - 2015-03-23
judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138244 - 2015-03-23
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
[PDF]
Russell S. Gilson v. City of De Pere
, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. CITY OF DE PERE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14899 - 2017-09-21
, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. CITY OF DE PERE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14899 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SCS of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Milwaukee County
the determination of whether its terms are ambiguous, is a legal matter that we decide de novo. Borchardt v. Wilk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2607 - 2017-09-19
the determination of whether its terms are ambiguous, is a legal matter that we decide de novo. Borchardt v. Wilk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2607 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
the Commission’s decision and order de novo, applying the same standard of review as the trial court, but owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
the Commission’s decision and order de novo, applying the same standard of review as the trial court, but owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Willie E. Johnson
of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented at the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21
of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented at the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 65
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81713 - 2014-09-15
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81713 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). This court’s “standard of review on summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767943 - 2024-02-22
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). This court’s “standard of review on summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767943 - 2024-02-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
de novo. Id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185, 717 N.W.2d at 3. ¶9 As noted, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56991 - 2014-09-15
de novo. Id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185, 717 N.W.2d at 3. ¶9 As noted, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56991 - 2014-09-15