Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 29823 for des.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Bank One v. Christian C. Ofojebe
is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as did the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18332 - 2017-09-21
is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as did the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18332 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
2007 WI APP 125
the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review”). Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28539 - 2007-04-26
the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review”). Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28539 - 2007-04-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63393 - 2014-09-15
from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63393 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
the Commission’s decision and order de novo, applying the same standard of review as the trial court, but owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
the Commission’s decision and order de novo, applying the same standard of review as the trial court, but owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 65
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81713 - 2014-09-15
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81713 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). This court’s “standard of review on summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767943 - 2024-02-22
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). This court’s “standard of review on summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767943 - 2024-02-22
[PDF]
SCS of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Milwaukee County
the determination of whether its terms are ambiguous, is a legal matter that we decide de novo. Borchardt v. Wilk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2607 - 2017-09-19
the determination of whether its terms are ambiguous, is a legal matter that we decide de novo. Borchardt v. Wilk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2607 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
747. We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. Id. ¶18 Our rules require an attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113750 - 2017-09-21
747. We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. Id. ¶18 Our rules require an attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113750 - 2017-09-21