Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 29828 for des.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 29828 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
subject to de novo review. See State v. Smith, 2009 WI App 16, ¶4, 316 Wis. 2d 165, 762 N.W.2d 856, aff’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
[PDF]
Ernest J. Pagels, Jr. v. John Vargas
it found that John Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6435 - 2017-09-19
it found that John Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6435 - 2017-09-19
2007 WI APP 125
the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review”). Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28539 - 2007-04-26
the three levels of deference: “great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review”). Even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28539 - 2007-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138244 - 2015-03-23
judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo by applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138244 - 2015-03-23
Ernest J. Pagels, Jr. v. John Vargas
Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result of excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6435 - 2005-03-31
Vargas’ and Jessica Vargas’ failure to appear at a de novo hearing was the result of excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6435 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). This court’s “standard of review on summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767943 - 2024-02-22
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). This court’s “standard of review on summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767943 - 2024-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
to modify support. ¶4 Martin moved for a hearing de novo. Martin requested that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142086 - 2015-05-20
to modify support. ¶4 Martin moved for a hearing de novo. Martin requested that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142086 - 2015-05-20
State v. Willie E. Johnson
appropriate standard of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14592 - 2005-03-31
appropriate standard of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Odell Carter, Jr.
must apply a de novo standard. Citing State v. Herfel, 49 Wis. 2d 513, 521, 182 N.W.2d 232 (1971
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16067 - 2017-09-21
must apply a de novo standard. Citing State v. Herfel, 49 Wis. 2d 513, 521, 182 N.W.2d 232 (1971
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16067 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Willie E. Johnson
of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented at the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21
of review is de novo. Second, by applying this standard to the evidence presented at the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21