Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 6394 for dr.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 6394 for dr.
Dawn D. Hughes v. Mark A. Hughes
occasions, prepared a report after considering Dr. Broll’s report. She also recommended that primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13352 - 2005-03-31
occasions, prepared a report after considering Dr. Broll’s report. She also recommended that primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13352 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dawn D. Hughes v. Mark A. Hughes
, Mark twice and Julie on four occasions, prepared a report after considering Dr. Broll’s report. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13352 - 2017-09-21
, Mark twice and Julie on four occasions, prepared a report after considering Dr. Broll’s report. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13352 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
with and evaluated J.M. ¶16 First, the County called Dr. Marshall Bales, a medical doctor board certified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211322 - 2018-06-21
with and evaluated J.M. ¶16 First, the County called Dr. Marshall Bales, a medical doctor board certified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211322 - 2018-06-21
State v. Richard A. Brown
. The circuit court appointed Dr. Michael Kotkin, a psychologist, to examine Brown and file a report as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16787 - 2005-03-31
. The circuit court appointed Dr. Michael Kotkin, a psychologist, to examine Brown and file a report as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16787 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Brown
for supervised release. The circuit court appointed Dr. Michael Kotkin, a psychologist, to examine Brown
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16787 - 2017-09-21
for supervised release. The circuit court appointed Dr. Michael Kotkin, a psychologist, to examine Brown
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16787 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven E. Isbell
was revoked and he was sent to Dodge Correctional Institution to await sentencing. There, Dr. Debra L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8185 - 2005-03-31
was revoked and he was sent to Dodge Correctional Institution to await sentencing. There, Dr. Debra L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8185 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven E. Isbell
was revoked and he was sent to Dodge Correctional Institution to await sentencing. There, Dr. Debra L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8185 - 2017-09-19
was revoked and he was sent to Dodge Correctional Institution to await sentencing. There, Dr. Debra L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8185 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven E. Isbell
was revoked and he was sent to Dodge Correctional Institution to await sentencing. There, Dr. Debra L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7961 - 2005-03-31
was revoked and he was sent to Dodge Correctional Institution to await sentencing. There, Dr. Debra L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7961 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven E. Isbell
sentencing. There, Dr. Debra L. Anderson conducted an interview with Isbell where he told her that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7961 - 2017-09-19
sentencing. There, Dr. Debra L. Anderson conducted an interview with Isbell where he told her that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7961 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the subject of another commitment. ¶7 The County next called Dr. Marshall Bales to testify. Bales had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316161 - 2020-12-17
the subject of another commitment. ¶7 The County next called Dr. Marshall Bales to testify. Bales had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316161 - 2020-12-17