Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 8262 for gf-175.

[PDF] State v. Lawrence P. Sajdik
."'" State v. Lee, 175 Wis.2d 348, 356, 499 N.W.2d 250, 253 (Ct. App. 1993) (quoting Colorado v. Spring, 479
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8224 - 2017-09-19

Urban A. Hubert, Jr. v. Town of Menasha Police Department
, 107 Wis.2d 400, 414-15, 320 N.W. 2d 175, 184 (1982). Further, a circuit court has the statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14949 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Brenda J. Hessey
at 82. Also, in State v. Mattes, 175 Wis.2d 572, 581, 499 N.W.2d 711, 715 (Ct. App. 1993), we refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10959 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Marilyn C. Goetsch v. Howard N. Goetsch
that a reasonable judge could reach. Loy v. Bunderson, 107 Wis.2d 400, 414-15, 320 N.W.2d 175, 184 (1982). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13180 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Douglas J. Richer v. Donald Gudmanson
by the writ. State ex rel. Richards v. Leik, 175 Wis.2d 446, 455, 499 N.W.2d 276, 280 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12978 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
the application of § 971.08 was controlled by State v. Chavez, 175 Wis. 2d 366, 498 N.W.2d 887 (Ct. App. 1993
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16657 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
the application of § 971.08 was controlled by State v. Chavez, 175 Wis. 2d 366, 498 N.W.2d 887 (Ct. App. 1993
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16659 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
the application of § 971.08 was controlled by State v. Chavez, 175 Wis. 2d 366, 498 N.W.2d 887 (Ct. App. 1993
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16658 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
State v. Shiffra, 175 Wis. 2d 600, 499 N.W.2d 719 (Ct. App. 1993) modified by State v. Green, 2002
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171644 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
in considering the relevant factors and the demeanor of the defendant.” See State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74796 - 2011-12-05