Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 55745 for n y c.
Search results 1111 - 1120 of 55745 for n y c.
[PDF]
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
. __________________________________________________________________ NO. 00-3478 IN RE THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO CARLOS C., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3427 - 2017-09-19
. __________________________________________________________________ NO. 00-3478 IN RE THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO CARLOS C., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3427 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the court concluded there had been no substantial change in circumstances because “[n]either parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83228 - 2014-09-15
, the court concluded there had been no substantial change in circumstances because “[n]either parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83228 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. RYAN C. DEMARS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101510 - 2017-09-21
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. RYAN C. DEMARS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101510 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
. __________________________________________________________________ NO. 00-3478 IN RE THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO CARLOS C., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3428 - 2017-09-19
. __________________________________________________________________ NO. 00-3478 IN RE THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO CARLOS C., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3428 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
concluded there had been no substantial change in circumstances because “[n]either parties’ financial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83228 - 2015-04-07
concluded there had been no substantial change in circumstances because “[n]either parties’ financial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83228 - 2015-04-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was able to isolate Y-STR DNA evidence (a set of genetic markers passed identically from father to son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248649 - 2019-10-16
was able to isolate Y-STR DNA evidence (a set of genetic markers passed identically from father to son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248649 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
State v. Fred J. Odell
** STATUS: ACTIVE WCIS TRANS CODE: Y NAME: ODELL, FRED J SCHD DATE: 08/25/93 SCH PROCED: POST
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9552 - 2017-09-19
** STATUS: ACTIVE WCIS TRANS CODE: Y NAME: ODELL, FRED J SCHD DATE: 08/25/93 SCH PROCED: POST
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9552 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Fred J. Odell
** STATUS: ACTIVE WCIS TRANS CODE: Y NAME: ODELL, FRED J SCHD DATE: 08/25/93 SCH PROCED: POST
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9273 - 2017-09-19
** STATUS: ACTIVE WCIS TRANS CODE: Y NAME: ODELL, FRED J SCHD DATE: 08/25/93 SCH PROCED: POST
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9273 - 2017-09-19
County of Outagamie v. Kenneth C. Luedke
of Outagamie, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kenneth C. Luedke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14092 - 2005-03-31
of Outagamie, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kenneth C. Luedke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14092 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Outagamie v. Kenneth C. Luedke
-RESPONDENT, V. KENNETH C. LUEDKE, DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14092 - 2014-09-15
-RESPONDENT, V. KENNETH C. LUEDKE, DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14092 - 2014-09-15