Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11101 - 11110 of 30169 for consulta de causas.
Search results 11101 - 11110 of 30169 for consulta de causas.
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9930 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9930 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129031 - 2014-11-18
. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Arends, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129031 - 2014-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of constitutional fact that is reviewed de novo. State v. Kempainen, 2015 WI 32, ¶16, 361 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214544 - 2018-06-27
is a question of constitutional fact that is reviewed de novo. State v. Kempainen, 2015 WI 32, ¶16, 361 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214544 - 2018-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Bobbie M.
on examination of the facts and application of the relevant law.”). We review de novo whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4931 - 2017-09-19
on examination of the facts and application of the relevant law.”). We review de novo whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was de minimus and insignificant over the course of the marriage; that, as a whole, the parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127892 - 2017-09-21
was de minimus and insignificant over the course of the marriage; that, as a whole, the parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127892 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
requires us to interpret statutes and regulations, a question of law that we review de novo. E.S. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33086 - 2014-09-15
requires us to interpret statutes and regulations, a question of law that we review de novo. E.S. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33086 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan R. Blount
performance was deficient and prejudicial,” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127-28, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8730 - 2017-09-19
performance was deficient and prejudicial,” de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127-28, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8730 - 2017-09-19
City of Madison v. Carl J. Bock
this court reviews de novo. Baldwin, 212 Wis.2d at 254-55, 569 N.W.2d at 41. Furthermore, if evidence has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13109 - 2005-03-31
this court reviews de novo. Baldwin, 212 Wis.2d at 254-55, 569 N.W.2d at 41. Furthermore, if evidence has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13109 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michelle L. Danielson
, 248 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. We review conclusions of law de novo. Id. We consider
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24947 - 2006-04-27
, 248 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. We review conclusions of law de novo. Id. We consider
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24947 - 2006-04-27
State v. Xavier R. Neave
of the statute presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d 409, 414, 542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13324 - 2005-03-31
of the statute presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Sostre, 198 Wis.2d 409, 414, 542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13324 - 2005-03-31