Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11101 - 11110 of 30164 for de.
Search results 11101 - 11110 of 30164 for de.
State v. Bruce A. Rumage
review de novo. See id. Rumage would have been prejudiced only if this case actually presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12093 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See id. Rumage would have been prejudiced only if this case actually presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12093 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). “The application of the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule is an issue of law,” subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250474 - 2019-11-21
). “The application of the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule is an issue of law,” subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250474 - 2019-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. Village of Trempealeau v. Mikrut, 2004 WI 79, ¶7, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11
review de novo. Village of Trempealeau v. Mikrut, 2004 WI 79, ¶7, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075753 - 2026-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
is frivolous is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brunson v. Ward, 2001 WI 89, ¶27, 245 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101402 - 2013-08-28
is frivolous is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brunson v. Ward, 2001 WI 89, ¶27, 245 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101402 - 2013-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶4 West argues the circuit court referenced incorrect information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31761 - 2008-02-06
review de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶4 West argues the circuit court referenced incorrect information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31761 - 2008-02-06
Thomas Norman v. Ruby Faulkner
a question of law, and as such is reviewed de novo. See Graziano v. Town of Long Lake, 191 Wis.2d 812, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11400 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, and as such is reviewed de novo. See Graziano v. Town of Long Lake, 191 Wis.2d 812, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11400 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 113
requires that we interpret Wis. Stat. § 973.155(1)(b), a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28262 - 2007-04-26
requires that we interpret Wis. Stat. § 973.155(1)(b), a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28262 - 2007-04-26
State v. Wayne Cornelius
that these theories were never presented to the jury. An appeal is not a trial de novo at which the defendant can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18658 - 2005-06-20
that these theories were never presented to the jury. An appeal is not a trial de novo at which the defendant can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18658 - 2005-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion to modify a sentence if a defendant shows the existence of a new factor. Id., ¶33. We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141395 - 2015-05-12
discretion to modify a sentence if a defendant shows the existence of a new factor. Id., ¶33. We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141395 - 2015-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. ¶13 The guaranty that Thomas acknowledges having read and signed put the Woods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96469 - 2013-05-07
de novo. Id. ¶13 The guaranty that Thomas acknowledges having read and signed put the Woods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96469 - 2013-05-07