Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11101 - 11110 of 50070 for our.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
representation of him, and nothing in our independent review of the record would support a claim that trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977244 - 2025-07-02

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
representation of him, and nothing in our independent review of the record would support a claim that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977244 - 2025-07-02

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
report that leads us to conclude otherwise. Nothing in our independent review of the Record would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977228 - 2025-07-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106647 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the trial court acted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219324 - 2018-09-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and protection goals as stated during the sentencing hearing.” Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756081 - 2024-01-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
fees. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174550 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Quentin D.
. No. 99-1130 3 was in jeopardy.” Although our review of the trial court’s legal conclusions is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15450 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was informed of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190852 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for reconsideration of a decision denying Locke’s request for plea withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144518 - 2017-09-21